<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Declarative Ajax catching on</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markbaker.ca/blog/2006/10/declarative-ajax-catching-on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markbaker.ca/blog/2006/10/declarative-ajax-catching-on/</link>
	<description>Celebrating the power of the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.markbaker.ca/blog/2006/10/declarative-ajax-catching-on/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 04:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markbaker.ca/blog/2006/10/19/declarative-ajax-catching-on/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Hogwash indeed.

Trackback! http://www.mnot.net/blog/2006/10/19/declarative_ajax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hogwash indeed.</p>
<p>Trackback! <a href="http://www.mnot.net/blog/2006/10/19/declarative_ajax" rel="nofollow">http://www.mnot.net/blog/2006/10/19/declarative_ajax</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Nottingham</title>
		<link>http://www.markbaker.ca/blog/2006/10/declarative-ajax-catching-on/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nottingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 03:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markbaker.ca/blog/2006/10/19/declarative-ajax-catching-on/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Big +1.

I&#039;m glad to see Dave Johnson&#039;s post; writing up how I got to hinclude has been on my todo list for a while, and now I don&#039;t have to do it. :)

I&#039;m thinking of logging a TAG issue about HTML extensibility, because the validity-heads say that any extension like this is fundamentally broken, and bad for HTML. Which I say hogwash to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big +1.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see Dave Johnson&#8217;s post; writing up how I got to hinclude has been on my todo list for a while, and now I don&#8217;t have to do it. :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking of logging a TAG issue about HTML extensibility, because the validity-heads say that any extension like this is fundamentally broken, and bad for HTML. Which I say hogwash to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

