Gina, because of the modification of the lease, a new lease would be appropriate. Which means that if the individual tenant/applicant is not qualified, you have no reason to accept that person. I would be in advance with the remaining tenant and I would say – I really want to have another tenant as soon as possible. If the unit is completely cleaned and in good condition after 30 days, I will return your deposit with $500 in cash Personally, I like this approach, because it is an insurance policy that your tenant does not get angry and destroys the property, and it encourages them to be outside within this 30-day period. Whether or not you offer cash, you should give 30 days` notice in writing. You can definitely try Kailah, but I think they would let you at most break the lease and move before reducing your monthly rent. However, they have a good point, because those who consider smoking an attractive feature today find themselves in a very different situation. I think that would justify a new lease. Thank you for the clarification. I have not found anything in this situation that favors the owner. Since the 21 days are the law, the rights of the tenant are to be accepted, I think.
But I`m a New York landlord, not a lawyer, so I`d check with your lawyer. I will vote for the 21 days that put the 30 days out of mine, in accordance with the signed agreement. It may not be reasonable (because the tenant has signed and agreed to the terms), but think about most state laws. They always replace. If you only have a small clause or a small amount of language to add to your lease agreement, you can use the process above. If the changes to the existing lease agreement are essential, the lessor may prefer to prepare a new contract or an amendment (sometimes called an amendment). This agreement, new or additional, must be signed by all parties before becoming binding. What would be to continue? I guess the basement tenants didn`t hurt you, so what`s the point of the lawsuit? Just to win? This seems like a huge waste of time. Complaint is not always the option, so forget it. The quick answer is yes.
If so, you could be released from the lease if it has been broken because the tenants in the cellar occupy your laundry room. If you haven`t taken your laundry room and still have access to it, then you really don`t have a big case for breaking the lease. It looks like you need to contact the owner to get some answers. If you don`t like the answers you receive, you need to find another owner. It looks like he`s trying to push every inch out of the property, and if that`s stopping your luck, your only way out is to move when the new tenants are under a lease and take your place. If you`re willing to change the lease, you can do it in one of the following ways: Tyler, I start by saying that it seems like a bad deal on the part of the landlord, from what you`re telling me. If the lease was written to contain the refrigerator, it should cover the costs of repair and replacement. Writing a new lease to avoid fees will obviously only upset a good tenant. So one of the two things is going to happen in this scenario – 1. You are a bad tenant and she is trying to get rid of you.
It may not be the last nail in the coffin, so you expect worse things if you stay. 2. You are a good tenant who is dealing with a bad landlord. You can try to argue with her to save your tenancy, but if she is blind to the fact that she is alienating a good tenant, your argument may not go very far. One way or another, I seem to have to find a better location and a new apartment. These things never end well when both parties think they are right. If your landlord tries to change the rules for you during the lease, you stay upright. Document all correspondence and interactions with your landlord and continue to pay your rent in the agreed amount….