{"id":113,"date":"2003-03-17T16:36:00","date_gmt":"2003-03-17T20:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/wp\/?p=200"},"modified":"2003-03-17T16:36:00","modified_gmt":"2003-03-17T20:36:00","slug":"mark-pilgrim-on-xhtml-basic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/2003\/03\/mark-pilgrim-on-xhtml-basic\/","title":{"rendered":"Mark Pilgrim on XHTML Basic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mark talks about how he\n<a href=\"http:\/\/diveintomark.org\/archives\/2003\/03\/15\/about_the_mobile_edition.html\">implemented<\/a>\nhis Dive Into Mark Mobile Edition, and\nin doing so talks about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/xhtml-basic\/\">XHTML Basic<\/a>,\nwhich I co-edited.  He&#8217;s mostly correct, but there are some points I&#8217;d like to\nrespond to.<\/p>\n\n<p>The &#8220;link&#8221; element has a extremely low conformance profile; all it means to\nsupport it is that you don&#8217;t fault when you discover it.  Supporting &#8220;link&#8221; doesn&#8217;t\nmean you have to support CSS.<\/p>\n\n<p>As for the list of elements which XHTML Basic left out, &#8220;b&#8221;, &#8220;i&#8221;, &#8220;center&#8221;,\nand &#8220;font&#8221; aren&#8217;t there because XHTML 1.0 &#8211; from which XHTML Basic builds &#8211;\nremoved them in the &#8220;presentation belongs in stylesheets&#8221; blitz of 1999.\nNested tables were indeed removed based on extensive feedback and <em>wide<\/em>\nindustry support for doing so, due to the memory consumed during their processing.\nThough I don&#8217;t know for sure, I&#8217;m quite confident that AvantGo does not support\narbitrarily complex nested tables, which suggests that some form of subset would\nneed to be defined should their solution ever be opened up anyhow.<\/p>\n\n<p>It is not true that XHTML Basic has to use the\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.ietf.org\/rfc\/rfc3236.txt\">application\/xhtml+xml<\/a> media\ntype.  In many cases it is appropriate to use &#8220;text\/html&#8221;, though the W3C\napparently disagrees with me there; their\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/xhtml-media-types\/\">&#8220;XHTML Media Types&#8221;<\/a> note says that\nit &#8220;SHOULD NOT&#8221; be used.  Whatever.  I doubt any text\/html processor would\nhave trouble with XHTML Basic, just don&#8217;t expect it to be treated as XML or\nXHTML.<\/p>\n\n<p>Mark&#8217;s conclusion, &#8220;As I said, XHTML Basic has no basis in reality. Ignore it.&#8221;,\nfor North Americans, probably isn&#8217;t too far from the truth.  In much of Asia and\nparts of Europe though, it&#8217;s important, and its importance will probably be\nspreading.<\/p>\n\n<p>Not that I really care that much.  The reason I contributed to its\ndevelopment was because of Sun&#8217;s objective that WAP should use commodity\nprotocols rather than wireless specific ones, and we did that.  Though\nWAP 2.0 extended XHTML Basic, I&#8217;m confident that in time, those\nextensions will be ignored and HTML\/XHTML will remain in some form,\nlikely richer than XHTML Basic.  I look forward to seeing that language\ndocumented after the fact; XHTML Basic 3.2 anyone? 8-)<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Mark talks about how he implemented his Dive Into Mark Mobile Edition, and in doing so talks about XHTML Basic, which I co-edited. He&#8217;s mostly correct, but there are some points I&#8217;d like to respond to. The &#8220;link&#8221; element has a extremely low conformance profile; all it means to support it is that you don&#8217;t [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[34,40],"class_list":["post-113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-w3c","tag-xml"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.markbaker.ca\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}