Via Jim Webber, a really nice description of the differences between RPC and state transfer approaches using a uniform interface. “The message on the channel no longer represents an instruction but rather an event, a notification that something happened”
(
link) [
del.icio.us/distobj]
Once again, I’m co-chairing, with
Jeremy Carroll
the
developer’s track
of the
WWW2006 conference. Well, actually,
if you’ve been paying close attention you’d recognize that last year
(and in previous years) it wasn’t a track, it was instead a separate
day. This year though, it’s a track like any other, with sessions on
each day of the conference.
Believe it or not, there’s a significant enough of a difference
between organizing a track and organizing a day, that we’ve had some
troubles. Thankfully though, we’ve finally made our way past them and
have just posted the
Call for Papers.
Please consider submitting. The deadline is March 19th.
Tags:
web,
www,
microformats,
semanticweb,
mobile,
webservices.
“Now, at last, we have tangible evidence of how useful Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and SAP find it [WS-I] as a place to work together”. Ouch! Did I mentioned that WSI is my local waste disposal outfit? 8-)
(
link) [
del.icio.us/distobj]
“If MoveOn and other organizations want more assuredness of delivery of their message, they should be sending their message in channels that don’t have spam.” +1
(
link) [
del.icio.us/distobj]
“Especially appreciated are use cases and specific scenarios where a different approach or protocol [other than HTTP/URIs] would have worked better.” Somebody’s got their priorities straight. Kudos.
(
link) [
del.icio.us/distobj]