Ho hum, another RESTful API for a large scale system. Surrender now, Web services advocates, the people have spoken; protocol dependence is GOOD
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

Tony hits the nail on the head

What is SOAP? It’s an HTTP POST containing XML, and an HTTP response containing XML. You can make an echo server by – here it is – simply serving a static XML file. That’s it. Just put an XML file on your http server and you’re done.

Indeed.

Alternately, if you feel the need, you can POST the content to the echo service. If you want to wrap it in SOAP too, even that’d be fine. Just watch that immediate child of soapenv:Body, because what you ABSOLUTELY do not need, is an “echo operation“. You just need the content to be echoed, and the address of the service; document in, document out.

That’s document exchange. That’s REST.

Can we get some real work done now, please?

Eve concludes an interesting post about DITA with an observation on SOA;

The trend in distributed computing is towards service-oriented architectures (SOAs). Early in the life of this buzzword, some people said it should really be called a document-oriented architecture (except for the unpleasant acronym :-) because it’s really all about document-passing rather than a tightly coupled RPC paradigm, that is, if you want to be successful at reusing the components.

Document passing, yes! Hmm, anybody know of an existing system anyplace that’s good for passing documents around? 8-) 8-(

Dave Winer asks: Let’s make the Google API an open standard.

I like the sentiment, but come on, everybody knows the Google API is, erm, “suboptimal”. 8-) What’s wrong with OpenSearch?

A bold claim; “placing the source address in the IP packet was an architectural mistake, among other things because it led people to place trust in something inherently untrustworthy”
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

… for Firefox, very cool.

Now, if only I could snarf sessions via GET (and otherwise mutate/manage them with HTTP), I’d be all set.

Via Adam.

Some thoughts on Adam Bosworth’s latest
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]
“the objective is to put Rearden [sic] every desktop” That’s so 1989! I mean, more power to them if they can do it, but it’d likely be a whole lot easier to use the Web.
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]
I used to look forward to SAS flights and their awesome food. Now you have to pay for it (water too!), and it sucks. You also have to pay for Wifi at their lounge at LHR. Sad.
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]
Nicely argued, Lucas
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]