Web Things, by Mark Baker

“In our post-game analysis, Tantek and I felt that the Developers Day track on microformats went incredibly well” +1 !
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

Hey, not a bad stab at a description language by Marc. It seems to carry along some WSDL baggage though, in that it has both operations and methods(?!?!). Which defines the contract, I wonder?
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

Via Stefan, this from Dave Orchard;

If there’s a core concept to examine in REST description languages wrt WSDL, it’s whether WSDL’s aggregation of operations into interfaces and then binding to http makes sense.

As my grade two teacher used to say, “No sh*t, Sherlock”! 8-)

Actually, she didn’t say that, but wouldn’t it be funny if she did?

Tim liked our panel
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

Pina has a couple of Bosworth’s slides that you might find interesting
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

“[…]SOAP, XML-RPC and REST (although they didn’t name XML-RPC, I think it’s more widely deployed than the other two)” Almost, Dave. You’re just off by an order of magnitude of orders of magnitude.
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

How to build a slideshow widget …
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

Steve seems to be assuming a different definition of “object orientation” than Michi, or me, or probably most people. My advice; avoid the term.
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]

Adam’s pitch at the “Web services considered harmful” panel was basically identical to this
(link) [del.icio.us/distobj]