Wow, what’s the record for most minority opinions on one W3C TR? Three were submitted today.
(
link) [
Mark Baker’s Bookmarks]
I got a couple of comments on the
diagram,
so patched it up.
Jim Webber posted
a picture in an earlier blog entry that I’ve tweaked to reflect
my views of large scale software architectural evolution (or lack
thereof 8-) over the the past 10 or so years.
The differences with Jim’s can be explained thusly;
- Though REST wasn’t published until 2000, the major architectural
work behind the Web, as I understand it (can’t find the message from Roy
where I thought I recalled him saying this), was basically wrapped up
in 1993
- I consider document based RPC – i.e. same semantics as RPC, only
without the operation in the message – to be
worse than RPC
- As much as I prefer “processMessage” to what most people know “SOA”
to be, I still consider it inferior to REST, since it’s missing an application
model (REST has hypermedia), as well as layering (or perhaps I just need a
more detailed breakdown of the constraints of a processMessage-oriented
architecture)
- The
Semantic Web and
ARRESTED
are extensions built upon the Web and REST. I believe that these will be
the future of loosely coupled, document oriented services offered and
integrated over the Internet
Interesting report which includes some of their ideas on PVR UI design
(
link) [
Mark Baker’s Bookmarks]
My deep thought for the day …
Evolvability is a special case of integrability, where one
integrates over time rather than space.
Via Jim McGee,
a quote
from an idol of mine,
David Gelernter;
Beauty is more important in computing than anywhere else in technology because software is so complicated. Beauty is the ultimate defence against complexity.
Amen.
Which reminds me, I still have some invites left if anybody wants one.
(
link) [
Mark Baker’s Bookmarks]
Dave Orchard fights for the right to have a built-in dependency to HTTP in WSDL 2.0. Go Dave! I love it when a plan comes together.
(
link) [
Mark Baker’s Bookmarks]